<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barriers to entry in publishing a peer-reviewed journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/</link>
	<description>100% Natural</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Britannica Should Have Won This War Years Ago &#187; Doctor Recommended</title>
		<link>http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Britannica Should Have Won This War Years Ago &#187; Doctor Recommended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>[...] And while some may say each of these organizations is trying to cater to a different clientele, that would be nonsensical in this age of dying gatekeepers and open access. [Note: another article could discuss the differences between the structure of article layout between the two behemoths; accuracy is another issue altogether] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And while some may say each of these organizations is trying to cater to a different clientele, that would be nonsensical in this age of dying gatekeepers and open access. [Note: another article could discuss the differences between the structure of article layout between the two behemoths; accuracy is another issue altogether] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Recommended &#187; Dewey Decimal Is Going the Way Of The Dodo</title>
		<link>http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Recommended &#187; Dewey Decimal Is Going the Way Of The Dodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>[...] Apropos my post regarding the use of Wiki&#8217;s in academia comes word that USC is rolling out a collaborative effort similar to Wikipedia.Â¬â€  The project&#8217;s purpose is initially centered around the sexy field of Media Studies. More on digital libraries: 1 2 3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apropos my post regarding the use of Wiki&#8217;s in academia comes word that USC is rolling out a collaborative effort similar to Wikipedia.Â¬â€  The project&#8217;s purpose is initially centered around the sexy field of Media Studies. More on digital libraries: 1 2 3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Recommended &#187; What do Noah Kagan, Amanda Congdon and Robert Scoble have in common?</title>
		<link>http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Recommended &#187; What do Noah Kagan, Amanda Congdon and Robert Scoble have in common?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://movementarian.com/2006/06/26/barriers-to-entry-in-publishing-a-peer-reviewed-journal/#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>[...] It also shows two things. First, it illustrates just how boring the lives of most bloggers are in order for them to spread gossip about such a relatively mundane occurence. Second, if Congdon&#8217;s show was one of the best (and I would argue that it was at least as good as Zefrank) then it goes to show you the state of video podcasting is in. After all, there is a reason why most people podcasting are not high-paid radio or TV personalities in the first place, they are either really dull and/or ugly and therefore have little appeal to the masses (note: I&#8217;m all for by-passing the Gatekeepers). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It also shows two things. First, it illustrates just how boring the lives of most bloggers are in order for them to spread gossip about such a relatively mundane occurence. Second, if Congdon&#8217;s show was one of the best (and I would argue that it was at least as good as Zefrank) then it goes to show you the state of video podcasting is in. After all, there is a reason why most people podcasting are not high-paid radio or TV personalities in the first place, they are either really dull and/or ugly and therefore have little appeal to the masses (note: I&#8217;m all for by-passing the Gatekeepers). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
