http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/ 100% Natural Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:51:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-1492 10 years from now, where will they be? » Doctor Recommended Sat, 31 May 2008 17:43:46 +0000 http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/#comment-1492 [...] is wrong with Moore’s Law? Specialization, Centralization, and the Future of Chip Integration What do Botnets and GPGPUs have in common? Intel Has a Small Urethra FLOPS, MIPS, Watts and the Human Brain 10 years later, where are they [...] [...] is wrong with Moore’s Law? Specialization, Centralization, and the Future of Chip Integration What do Botnets and GPGPUs have in common? Intel Has a Small Urethra FLOPS, MIPS, Watts and the Human Brain 10 years later, where are they [...]

]]> http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-1493 10 years later, where are they now? » Doctor Recommended Sat, 17 May 2008 16:42:40 +0000 http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/#comment-1493 [...] Farewell to the DEC Alpha What a difference 36 years make So, you want to make a computer chip What do Botnets and GPGPUs have in common? GPU versatility Seth Lloyd’s Million Megahertz CPU What is wrong with Moore’s Law? [...] [...] Farewell to the DEC Alpha What a difference 36 years make So, you want to make a computer chip What do Botnets and GPGPUs have in common? GPU versatility Seth Lloyd’s Million Megahertz CPU What is wrong with Moore’s Law? [...]

]]> http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-1491 Mike’s Musings » What do Botnets and GPGPUs have in common? Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:35 +0000 http://movementarian.com/2007/09/15/what-do-botnets-and-gpgpus-have-in-common/#comment-1491 [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptSystems developed by Thinking Machines and Cray used thousands of processors to accomplish feats that one computer or hundreds of independent computers could not do alone. It is this collective cooperation that efficiency is achieved, … [...] [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptSystems developed by Thinking Machines and Cray used thousands of processors to accomplish feats that one computer or hundreds of independent computers could not do alone. It is this collective cooperation that efficiency is achieved, … [...]

]]>